Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01315 ADDENDUM
                            ADDENDUM TO
                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2011-1315
		COUNSEL:  NONE
		HEARING DESIRED:  NO


________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He receive a medical retirement from the Air Force Reserve 
rather than being discharged.

________________________________________________________________
_

RESUME OF CASE:

On 24 Jan 12, the Board for Corrections of Military Records 
(BCMR) considered and denied the applicant’s request to be 
medically retired.  For an accounting of the facts and 
circumstances surrounding the applicant’s discharge; and, the 
rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record 
of Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit I (with Exhibits A and H).  

By letter, dated 6 Feb 12, the applicant submitted a request for 
reconsideration.  The applicant states the Air Force Reserves 
failed to refer him to the Disability Evaluation System (DES) 
and failed to inform him of his rights.  The fact that the law 
was not followed, he did not know of his rights before being 
forced out of the Reserves.

In support of the appeal, the applicant provides personal 
statements, a copy of a Medical Examination for Voluntary 
Separation or Retirement letter, and paperwork from the 
Department of Veterans Affairs.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit J.

________________________________________________________________
_

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

In an earlier finding, the Board determined that there was 
insufficient evidence to warrant any corrective action.  After 
thoroughly reviewing the additional documentation submitted in 
support of his appeal and the evidence of record, we do not 
believe the applicant has overcome the rationale expressed in 
our previous decision.  Therefore, in view of the above, and in 
the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis upon 
which to recommend favorable consideration of the applicant’s 
request.  

________________________________________________________________
_

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the additional evidence presented 
did not demonstrate the existence of material error or 
injustice; that the application was denied without a personal 
appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered 
upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not 
considered with this application.

________________________________________________________________
_

The following members of the Board reconsidered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-1315 in Executive Session on 15 Oct 12, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	
The following additional documentary evidence was considered:

    	Exhibit I.  Record of Proceedings, dated 27 Jan 12, 
w/atchs.
    	Exhibit J.  Letter, Applicant, dated 6 Feb 12, w/atchs.





                                   
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 02179 3

    Original file (BC 2012 02179 3.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    STATEMENT OF FACTS: According to an AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, dated 4 Feb 12, the applicant’s Primary Care Manager (PCM), recommended a review by a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) or Physical Evaluation Board (PEB). AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial of the applicant's petition for continuation on active duty orders for the period 12 Jan 12 [sic] to 19 Sep 12. Exhibit G. Record of Proceedings, dated 30 Jul 13, w/atchs Exhibit H. Letter,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00516 2

    Original file (BC 2013 00516 2.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit H. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 7 Jan 15 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit J). While it appears as though the applicant was being processed for a fitness determination due to his disqualifying...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00744

    Original file (BC-2011-00744.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant did not have an MSD at the time he was in the Honorary Retired Reserve; he will retire with 26 years, 8 months, and 11 days of satisfactory service. If that period is counted as part of his 28 years of commissioned service in establishing his MSD, as it currently is, it denies him the opportunity to actually perform 28 years of service, since he was not permitted to serve for pay or points during the one year, one month, and four day period as an honorary retiree. The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2004-02769

    Original file (BC-2004-02769.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    After reviewing the literature stating that petroleum products may cause skin irritation, the fact the applicant had a long-standing diagnosis of psoriasis, and was employed in aircraft maintenance, which involved work with fuels, are insufficient to conclude that his psoriasis was permanently aggravated by his Reserve military service. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states during his Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC 2004 02769

    Original file (BC 2004 02769.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    After reviewing the literature stating that petroleum products may cause skin irritation, the fact the applicant had a long-standing diagnosis of psoriasis, and was employed in aircraft maintenance, which involved work with fuels, are insufficient to conclude that his psoriasis was permanently aggravated by his Reserve military service. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states during his Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 04310 2

    Original file (BC 2011 04310 2.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2011-04310 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reserve retirement be changed to a disability retirement. The applicant disagreed with the IPEB decision; however there is no evidence to show she sought further appellate review of the IPEB findings and recommended disposition. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2003-00371-3

    Original file (BC-2003-00371-3.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit M. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends granting relief by changing the record to reflect the applicant was permanently retired with a combined disability rating of 60 percent, for Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Degenerative Disc Disease, Cervical Spine, effective the previously established date of his removal from the Temporary...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05243

    Original file (BC 2013 05243.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05243 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His compensable disability rating of 30 percent from the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) be increased. The sources noted above reflect that the IPEB reviewed the case on 14 Dec 05 and determined that the condition was unfitting for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-1992-01342-2

    Original file (BC-1992-01342-2.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The AFBCMR Staff assumed the applicant was referring to his most recent case (BC-2004-02624), which was denied on 27 Dec 04, and in a letter dated 3 May 06 (Exhibit K), requested he provide copies of documents he alluded to his 14 Feb 06 submission. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: After reviewing the applicant’s latest submissions, a majority of the Board reconsidered his appeal but found the documentation insufficient to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-03786-2

    Original file (BC-2004-03786-2.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03786 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 18 Jul 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, limited motion in the lumbar and cervical spine and limited motion of the arms, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for...